Monday, August 15, 2011

What is management knowledge and how do B-schools create that?

This blog post discusses how reasoning can shed light to what 'management knowledge' is in order to clarify what makes management research and management education relevant to managers. My interest in philosophy and psychology of reasoning inevitably got me to consider  how managers think about the issues they face. Despite plenty of reflection by management scholars on their practical relevance, the lack of any attention to the ability of managers to think is striking. When a manager is faced with a lot of information (e.g. market share is dropping, a competitor has introduced new products, and key sales people have resigned), managers will try to conceive reasons for these observations, and to come up with with different actions justified by seemingly good reasons.

Reasoning about an investment
Let's think of a manager who must decide whether to invest into an expensive IT project to improve customer satisfaction. Now, one may approach this decision using a simple financial model: if the NPV of increased profits is greater than the NPV of project costs, that is a pretty good reason to make the investment. One of course will then need a way to reason about the costs and benefits. Alternatively,  a manager who has taken a strategic management course might think in terms of capabilities. Can my competitors imitate or substitute the resource I am seeking to develop for a lower cost than I am investing? The IT system may not be a necessary resource, the first mover advantage may be insignificant, and the cost for competitors to copy the system may actually be lower than the initial cost of developing it through trial and error. If these three considerations are all true then there are  pretty good reasons not to invest.

Finance and strategy provide competing ways to reason about the decision. Both of them include some rather explicit inferences (e.g. formula to calculate NPV; the rule "if 2nd mover advantage is greater than 1st mover advantage then do not be the first mover"). These "ways of reasoning"  also require a lot of tacit knowledge (e.g. how to come up with an estimate of costs associated with an IT project; how to figure out the imitability of a potential new capability).

My hypothesis is that wise and stupid (is there a reason why the concept 'stupid' is absent from all theory?) managers are mostly distinguished by substantive (practical) quality of the reasons they conceive for their actions and choices rather than the logical validity of their thinking. Although cognitive psychologists have found clear and stable individual-level differences in the ability for critical reasoning, the lack of attention to imitability or NPV calculations is more likely to distinguish good and bad managers than the number of logical mistakes they make. Philosophy of mind would have us believe that reasoning has in general relatively  little to do with formal logic and a lot to do with the meanings we hold (I believe this view is advocated by Davidson and also John Searle in Rationality in Action - a book that is all about reasoning and very little about typical rationality).

Management education
The above example suggests that management education should enable students to reason about situations they will encounter at work. Managers ought to have the ability to utilize explicit knowledge in their reasoning (e.g. finance formulas, the VRIN criteria of the RBV -- if you believe in it). However, they should also have tacit skills to reason well -- to know what kind of things make resources imitable or substitutable. Is it not a bit strange that probably more than 95% of basic business strategy courses on this planet teach students that  inimitability is a necessary reason to assume a resource to be a sustainable source of value, yet less than 5% of the courses probably address at all how the imitability of a resource might be inferred!

It may seem quite uncontroversial to say that management education should teach people how to think about business problems and business decisions. Yet, there has been a substantial movement towards evidence-based management. This perspective suggests that management is no different from medicine and the key goal of management education should be to provide the right answers (I should mention that evidence-based medicine has been criticized quite a bit too, so medicine may not be about the correct answers either). The idea is that good management research figures out the right answers to problems faced my managers and that management education communicates these answers to people. While this approach may work in many areas, it seems to me that a lot of problems faced by managers are idiosyncratic and require non-trivial amount of reasoning to figure out. Once some management scholar has evidence on whether firms in industry X should  implement the  IT system Y, the window of opportunity has surely already closed.

If reasoning about problems and solutions is what managers do, then  management education needs to provide managers with theoretical concepts (such as imitability, first mover advantage, net present value) and teach the managers how to competently utilize those concepts.

Relevance of management research
I am working on a paper concerning the practical relevance of management research with my colleagues at Hanken: Saku Mantere and Eero Vaara. The paper is based on the conception of management knowledge as explicit and tacit ability to reason using a certain set of concepts. I am slightly concerned about giving out our argument in this blog because there are no clear rules -- at least in principle the journals want to only publish arguments that haven't been published before. In practice, it would probably make little difference if I published the conclusions of our main arguments in this obscure blog.

One conclusion we'll reach that I am particularly fond of concerns the practical relevance of individual articles. Since evidence-based management has limited applicability (basically answering only questions common to all companies and being very limited in its ability to help in thinking about idiosyncratic problems), we should not consider articles with clear prescriptions as more "practically relevant" than studies without prescriptions. In our mind, an article has practical relevance if it provides explicit or tacit examples of how to use theoretical concepts to think about real-life problems in a productive manner. For example, research on organizational identity has provided us a very useful concept that helps understand and solve problems in organizations even though the research provides almost no  prescriptions (it would be silly to expect evidence-based rules such as "companies in industry X should develop an organizational identity with characteristics Y&Z to improve profits").


  1. I really got into this article. I found it to be interesting and loaded with unique points of interest. I like to read material that makes me think. Thank you for writing this great content.

  2. Like any advance, a loan must be reimbursed. Also, similar to any budgetary exchange you ought to completely know the certainties before you consent to anything. Since loans don't oblige security and don't have a charge, they most certainly do accompany higher account charges. Payday Loans

  3. Their credits scores are by and large poor starting now, after get-togethers have foreseen that would continually took off change in light of the way that they couldn't pay their bills on time. That is a veritable "Expert" for an auto advance association. In spite of what the borrower's budgetary examination may be, the borrower is still qualified to get a vehicles title credit.

  4. Bicycle advances are adumbrated for designation borrowers to purchase any bicycle of any model and make. Nevertheless, you want to be physically fit anthem in trademark genitalia of the already for an adequate course of action. Payday Loans

  5. Both of these sorts have their own drawback and focal points. It will likewise rely on upon the individual needs of a particular person. cash advance loans

  6. Military advances are elite advances that serve those individuals who have ever been the piece of the military. Resigned armed force faculty or the individuals who are as yet serving can apply for military credits. Military advances accompany low intrigue rate and are exceptionally adaptable when contrasted with different advances. You are affirmed effortlessly for military credits and can offer monetary guide for any reason like occasion, home change, instruction, auto and so forth. Online choices are numerous yet research will help you locate a loan specialist that has a decent remaining with the military group and in this way offers you the right rates. car title loans online chicago

  7. It is typically mentionable that, it's finest to take the car credits from the rumored establishments. This may without a doubt make a refinement on your EMI and distinctive credit related conventions. Additionally, you need to keep up checking your credit computations from Car Loan Calculator, from any related website. Cash Advance


  8. By reimbursing auto appellation advances, borrowers can advice accommodate their credit. So as to do as such, they allegation pay it aback absolutely on timetable, as set bottomward in the agreement of the assention. This will affair you admission to acceptable wellsprings of subsidizing after on.
    Check Cashing San-diego

  9. An critical piece of everyones way of life is money related dependability and unforeseen budgetary unsteadiness can be a requesting situation. It is not surprising for people to experience some kind of short expression money related unsteadiness. Cash Advance Corona

  10. That is on yearly of these bikes are adequate included tried and true. It talks reality firm to forerunner credits for enacted bikes. Regardless, that is anon change in appearance of creators who are putting exchanging pre-had perceived bikes. Payday Loans


  11. Movement aggregate relies on upon high up the measure of purposes of interest or property. Moored progresses USA can be gotten to by individuals who see CCJs, defaults, IVA or alike obligation. Any home credit holder can control for this money with no tangle and can see the reasons of premium.

  12. The APR figuring was not had any longing to apply to passing advances, for case, payday credits. It was relied on to apply to whole course of action drives in degree for a year or more. It is truly a hypothetical figure than accomplice with people to independent tantamount longer term advance things, like home credits or evident credit adjustments. car title loans chicago