Monday, August 8, 2011

Can a hedge fund eliminate human biases in reasoning?

One would imagine that organizations that make money through superior reasoning would develop practices and processes that reduce suspectibility to biases. And it turns to be so! The example is provided in recent New Yorker article on Bridgewater, the richest and strangest hedge fund on the planet. The owner of the fund, Ray Dalio, takes biases very seriously. The attempts of the organization to keep human tendencies at bay make the organization seem like a cult. Reporting by John Cassidy, quoted from New Yorker (within fair use):

Dalio asked for another opinion. From the back of the room, a young man dressed in a black sweatshirt started saying that a Chinese slowdown could have a big effect on global supply and demand. Dalio cut him off: “Are you going to answer me knowledgeably or are you going to give me a guess?” The young man, whom I will call Jack, said he would hazard an educated guess. “Don’t do that,” Dalio said. He went on, “You have a tendency to do this. . . . We’ve talked about this before.” After an awkward silence, Jack tried to defend himself, saying that he thought he had been asked to give his views. Dalio didn’t let up. Eventually, the young employee said that he would go away and do some careful calculations.
[...]

One day, I drove to Westport and sat in on a management-committee meeting, which had been set up for the purpose of “getting in synch” with a recent recruit, whom I’ll call Peter and who had come from a big financial firm. All nine members of Bridgewater’s management committee were sitting at a long wooden conference table. Peter, a lean man with fair hair, sat stiffly near the front: he looked like somebody anticipating a root canal. Jensen and McCormick were nominally in charge, but Dalio took over, telling Peter that, during a previous management meeting, he had answered emotionally in response to questioning from Jensen. “This is a common thing when somebody’s getting probed,” Dalio said. “Because the amygdala gets stimulated and you have that emotional reaction.” Peter agreed that he had become upset, especially when he sensed he was being accused of misleading his colleagues. “I felt in some sense my integrity was being attacked,” he said. “That’s when things spiralled out of control.” 

Dalio walked to the front of the room, where he wrote on a whiteboard, “FELT,” “INTEGRITY,” and “MISLED.” “?‘Felt’ is the key word here . . . and it’s a challenge for people,” he said. After a bit more discussion, he went on, “What we’re trying to have is a place where there are no ego barriers, no emotional reactions to mistakes. . . . If we could eliminate all those reactions, we’d learn so much faster.” (my emphasis)

Do social processes set up in organizations trump psychology? Or is Dalio's attempt to make humans non-human a futile undertaking? I believe we have good evidence that social contexts do matter, and the social conventions and patterns of conversation to some extent override psychological tendencies when people reason discursively. But there are limits to everything and Bridgewater seems a bit freaky (you can check their 'Principiles' out; they might be handy if you teach org. culture). But they are by some acocunts the most successful organization in their field, and one cannot rule out the possibility that it is because they have engineered a solution that might be accounted for through sociology of reasoning.

Many organizational processes might help actors overcome individual-level 'deficits' in reasoning, such as those identified by behavioral economists. For example, by simply requiring managers to provide explicit justifications (verbal or numeric) for choices they make can reduce the use of biased heuristics associated with non-reflective reasoning. On the other hand, interaction situations tend to lead to all kinds of other unproductive patterns in reasoning (e.g. social desirability bias). There are nice lists of individual-level biases (e.g. by Stancovich, ref at the end), but I am not aware of a good summarizing review on organizational or group-level effects on reasoning.

The passage quoted above is a pretty dystopic vision of future workplace, is it not?

Ref:
Stanovich, K. E. 2009. 'Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory?' in In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. (eds), 55-88. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

PS. Thanks to a visually giften friend of mine, I got some tips on making the blog more readable.
PPS. I accidentally called Bridgewater 'Blackwater'. Bridgewater is the hedge fund run by Dalio. Blackwater is the American mercenary group (now known as XE) where employee recreation allegedly involves murdering civilians.

6 comments:

  1. Subsequently, for a helpful quick advance you have to search for an option and auto title credit can help you. Auto credits San Antonio is set aside a few minutes critical requirements for what time is a main consideration. cash advance

    ReplyDelete
  2. You have to see what you can escape from such a credit. It won't take throughout the entire that for you to get such an advance prepared. You can get a dependable automobile title advance to bail you out with continuing anything you need to burn through cash on under control. cash advance

    ReplyDelete
  3. Used autos don't have a go at so low a value that each one can pay from own pocket, particularly if the purchaser has constrained wage sources. So when you go for an advance, you need to verify it is less troublesome and matches to you're reimbursing limit. Remembering this worry, moneylenders have outlined shabby utilized auto credits for you. Cash Advance

    ReplyDelete
  4. Individual credits for property holders are professedly considered as one of the most ideal approach to get cash for your own needs. What's more, think about what they are. Individual credits for property holders have low intrigue rates, adaptable advance reimbursement terms. Individual advances for mortgage holders can likewise be given in the event that you have former awful record as a consumer. You can acquire cash in understanding to your money related status and reimbursement limit. Individual credits for mortgage holders mean setting you're home as insurance or security for your advance. It would likewise imply that you're home is a danger in the event that you can't reimburse credit. Individual mortgage holder credits are exceptionally direct and can be put to any individual utilization at all. car title loans

    ReplyDelete
  5. You can locate various sites offering lucrative arrangements on low rate auto advances. Experience those destinations, gather their quotes, and look at them. At last, you will have the capacity to show signs of improvement arrangement that will be totally your pocket relieving. Besides, with the online choice, you can appreciate untouched application office and for that neither you have to spend nor you have to confront the bother of additional research material. check cashing near me

    ReplyDelete
  6. The particular issues included in title credits should in like way be talked about, particularly the acquisitions identified with over the top rates of diversions. Borrowers must pick in like way if the criticalness of the need is sufficiently earnest to consent to such higher rates of diversion. Check Cashing San-diego

    ReplyDelete